Access to Higher Education is a human right. It can be transformative and it:
1. Enables social mobility
2. Reduces poverty and provides access to well-paying jobs
3. Helps people develop a professional identity and provides life opportunities
4. Promotes critical thinking and analytical skills
5. Reduces recidivism and strengthens communities
Criminal History Screenings in college admissions create barriers to these opportunities for formerly incarcerated people.
Mass Incarceration: In the United States, the prison system has grown by over 700% since 1980 and there are currently 2.3 million people in prison (5). Mass incarceration disparately impacts people of color. Black men are seven times more likely to be incarcerated than white men (6).
Collateral Consequences: Formerly incarcerated individuals face barriers to accessing services, as well as restrictions on where they may work or live. These collateral consequences can range from denial of worker’s compensation to exclusion from public housing, and can impede successful reentry. There are more than 1,000 laws outlining the long-term consequences of criminal conviction in New York (7). See PCtP Blog here:
http://fromprisoncellstophd.org/pctp-blog
On One’s Own Merit: Research shows that (of colleges surveyed) 66% screen applicants for criminal history, and private institutions are more likely to collect and use the data in admissions decisions than public and two-year institutions (8). This leads to some applicants being denied access to education based on something other than their academic qualifications.
Lack of Evidence: There is no empirical evidence demonstrating that students with criminal records pose a greater safety risk on campus than those who do not.
Discouraging: Inquiry into criminal history, whatever its intent, discourages otherwise qualified people from applying (9). Asking applicants to “check the box” screens out qualified individuals.
Unnecessary Hurdles: Some colleges require applicants to obtain their criminal history records at their own expense. These records contain information that has been sealed, charges that have been dismissed, or information that has otherwise been deemed legally confidential, such as Youthful Offender adjudications, which admissions officials have no legal right to view.
Colleges and Universities Lack Consistent Screening Policies and Procedures
Just six percent of schools responding to a survey conducted by the Center for Community Alternatives report that their admissions process is identical for applicants with and without criminal records. 47.1% of higher education institutions lack a written policy regarding the admissions of applicants with criminal records.
Requirements vary by institution:
90% of institutions require a letter of explanation
63.2% require a letter from a corrections official
54.2% require a personal interview
38.5% require completion of community supervision
15.2% of respondents require applicants to submit rap sheets to institutions
Higher Education Reduces Recidivism (10):
Nationally, 43.3% of formerly incarcerated individuals are likely to return to prison within three years of release. The recidivism rate drops dramatically with access to higher education:
Masters: less than 1%
Baccalaureates: 5.6%
Associates: 13.7%
Increasing Access to Higher Education Pays Off
The value of higher education is clear. Higher education:
Decreases reliance on public assistance
Increases employment rates
Improves physical and mental health
Elevates quality of life for children
Strengthens communities
9. Fine, M., Torre, M.E., Boudin, K., et al. (2001). Changing Minds: The Impact of College in a Maximum Security Prison. The Graduate Center of the City University of New York.